You may have noticed my absence these past four months. I've
been steadily working on what I believed was the final draft of my follow up
novel to BREAKFAST WITH NERUDA. For nearly three years I've been accumulating
words, adding scenes and chapters, moving things around, and rewriting the
beginning. An earlier draft was rejected by my editor at Merit, with the
comment the stakes weren't high enough. So I examined the book again, chapter
by chapter, and reordered scenes and re drafted from the beginning.
At 72,000 words I thought the book was finished. Yet I
accumulated more rejections. While most of the agents I sent this to
complimented the writing and the well developed characters, they couldn't
relate to the story.
And that was the problem. When people asked me what my book
was about, the best answer I could come up with is "about 300 pages" because I had no story.
Had I wasted three years on writing a book going nowhere?
Yes and no.
Yes, because I spent 3-4 hours every day, including
holidays, on this set of characters and their journey. I worried about Michael,
Shelly and the others. In addition, I spent many hours researching environment
and oceanography to provide authenticity to one of my characters. (The result
of that is I now know how precarious our future is. Dystopian novels are within
inches of being reality.)
Yet no, the time was not
wasted because I know everything about my characters-- much more than the reader
will know. Most of the 72,000 words are unusable. At least in this story. I may
be able to use some scenes in a subsequent story.
So I set aside what I called my Frankennovel, and with the
help of a few writer friends' suggestions, started over. The last chapter of my
72,000 piece became the first chapter of the novel that seemed to write itself
in three months.
How was this possible? First, I stopped working on the
Frankenovel for a couple of weeks. Instead, I read. STORY GENIUS, WIRED FOR
STORY, THE ANATOMY OF STORY, and TAKE OFF YOUR PANTS. While reading the first
three books listed I learned I had no sense of story, and my book had a theme,
but no concept All of these guides include exercises to question what is at the
core of my story. The fourth book helped me see how being a panster vs. a
plotter is an inefficient ay to write. all these books taught me if you can't
define the truth behind your tale in a sentence, there's a problem.
It took me 72,000 words to find the inciting incident. Once
I isolated that final chapter from the Frankennovel, I was able to move the real story forward. Same characters and
location, but only about 15,000 words of the Frankennovel survived, written in as
flashbacks. Other than what is now Chapter One, the rest of the tale is
new.
The new manuscript weighs in at 76,000 words. My critique
group is helping point out where the book sags and where it sings. The best
part is I can now sum it up in one sentence. (which I won't tell you
yet...sorry.) Having that logline is a beacon to keep me on track so I don't
invent great scenes (like the funny one in Costco) that have nothing to do with
the plot. Like Luke Skywalker in the original Star Wars film, my mantra has
become "stay on target."
Happy Writing.
No comments:
Post a Comment